Your team has Claude.
Most of them use it like a search box.
Claude is one of the most capable tools your people have ever been handed. Used well, it drafts, analyzes, and reasons alongside them. Used out of the box, it answers trivia. Training is the difference between the two.
The Claude capability gap
The tool is not the bottleneck. The gap is between the small slice of your team who found a workflow that works, and everyone else still typing one-line questions.
Most organizations sit heavily to the right. The training moves the line. The audit shows you where yours sits today.
110,000+ people trained.
Maury Rogow has taught AI and brand storytelling to more than 110,000 students through LinkedIn Learning. He knows exactly where teams get stuck, because he has watched it happen at scale and fixed it, classroom by classroom.
He has run campaigns for Microsoft, Cisco, Comcast, NetApp, and LexisNexis. He is the author of Why Buyers Say No and CEO of Rip Media Group.
This is not a trainer reading slides about a tool he tried last month. This is an operator teaching what he uses every day.
Someone signed the company up for Claude. There was a link in Slack. Maybe a demo.
Then everyone went back to working the way they always have. A few power users pulled ahead. Everyone else opened it twice and closed it.
The gap is not the technology. It is the training.
Access does not equal adoption. Your people need structured, hands-on instruction tied to their actual job. Not a feature tour. Not a list of prompts. Real reps, on real work, with someone in the room who has done this before.
Five sessions. From access to habit.
Each session is live, hands-on, and built on your team’s actual documents, decisions, and workflows. Nobody watches a demo. Everybody works.
Foundation and prompting
What Claude is, what it is not, and how to ask so the output is worth using. Your team learns the prompt structure that separates a one-line answer from a finished draft, then applies it to a real task before the session ends.
Daily workflows by role
Drafting, rewriting, summarizing, and analysis mapped to each person’s real job. Everyone leaves with three workflows tied to their own work, not a generic use-case list.
Long documents, data, and Projects
Feeding Claude real source material: contracts, reports, research, spreadsheets. Your team learns to use Projects and long context so Claude works from your knowledge, not the open internet.
Judgment, guardrails, and safe use
When to trust the output and when to check it. What company data belongs in a prompt and what does not. The usage rules your security and legal teams will sign off on, taught as part of the work, not bolted on after.
Adoption that sticks
Team playbooks, shared prompt libraries, and a 30-day plan with named owners. The goal is not a good training week. It is usage that keeps climbing after we leave.
The five-session arc above is the standard build. Every engagement starts with an audit of how your team works today, and the curriculum is adjusted to match. A writing-heavy team gets more drafting. An analysis-heavy team gets more data and documents.
On-site or live virtual
Delivered at your office or over live video. Same hands-on format either way. No pre-recorded modules.
Built from an audit, not a template
Before Session 1, we review how your team actually works: the tools, the bottlenecks, the decisions. The curriculum is built to that.
Measured, not assumed
Usage and depth are tracked before, during, and after the program. You see the adoption move, or you see exactly where it stalled and why.
How long does the program run?
Five sessions, typically scheduled over four to six weeks. Spacing the sessions matters: your team applies each session’s work before the next one, and we open each session with a debrief of what worked.
What does it cost?
Pricing depends on team size, format, and how much curriculum customization your organization needs. Start with the free audit or book a consultation and you will have a proposal with exact numbers within days.
Our people already have access. Why would this be different?
Access is where most companies stop. This program is reps on real work, role by role, with measurement before and after. The difference shows up in how deeply the tool gets used, not in the sign-up count.
Our security and legal teams have concerns about AI and company data.
Good. They should. Session 4 covers data handling, guardrails, and usage rules directly, and those teams are invited into that session. Safe use is part of the curriculum, not an afterthought.
Can you train other AI tools, not just Claude?
Yes. We run a parallel program for Microsoft Copilot, and broader AI training covering ChatGPT and automation workflows is also available. Many teams run more than one, so we align the playbooks across tools.
Find out how far your team really is from using Claude well.
The free audit reviews how your team uses Claude today and shows you the gap between what it can do and what you’re getting. 24-hour turnaround. No obligation.
Get your free Claude audit.
We review how your team uses Claude today and show you the gap between what it can do and what you’re getting.
Got it. We’re on it.
Check your inbox within one business day. We’ll be in touch to set up your diagnosis.